Knighton

Knighton v. Cedarville Rancheria of Northern Paiute Indians

Good Law
234 F. Supp. 3d 1042·2017 WL 616465·2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21604
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 15, 2017Case No. 16-cv-02438-WHOCalifornia6,865 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Orrick, J.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Duanna Knighton, the former Tribal Administrator for defendant Cedar-ville Ranchería of. Northern Paiute Indians (“the Tribe”), seeks declaratory and in-junctive relief against the Tribe, Cedarville *1045 Ranchería Tribal Court (“Tribal Court”), and Tribal Court Judge Patricia R. Lenzi (“Tribal Judge Lenzi”) (collectively “defendants”) to avoid Tribal Court jurisdiction over claims that she defrauded the Tribe and breached her fiduciary duties to it. Defendants move to dismiss Knighton’s complaint because the Tribal Court has jurisdiction. I agree that it has both regulatory and adjudicative authority over its former employee under the facts alleged; accordingly, it has subject matter jurisdiction. Defendants’ motion is GRANTED WITH PREJUDICE.

BACKGROUND

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

A. The Cedarville Ranchería Tribe

Cedarville Ranchería of Northern Paiute Indians (“the Tribe”) is a federally recognized Indian tribe located in Medoc County, California. Id. ¶2; Duran Decl. ¶3 (Dkt. No. 10-2). It has approximately 12 voting members 2 and operates a 17-acre Ranchería in Cedarville, California. Compl. ¶ 2; Tribal Court Compl. ¶ 1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.