24/7 Customer, Inc. v. LivePerson, Inc.

Good Law
235 F. Supp. 3d 1102·2016 WL 7116723·2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 170139
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 7, 2016Case No.15-cv-02897-JSTCalifornia7,514 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Tigar, J.

CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff 24/7 Customer, Inc.’s (“[24]7”) Opening Claim Construction Brief, ECF No. 89. [24]7 and Defendant LivePerson, Inc. (“LivePerson”) propose competing constructions of four terms in U.S. Patent No. 8,396,741 (“the ’741 patent”), two terms in U.S. Patent No. 6,798,876 (“the ’876 patent”), and four terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 8,737,599 (“the ’599 patent”) and/or 9,077,804 (“the ’804 patent”). The Court construes the terms as set forth below.

I. BACKGROUND

On June 22, 2015, [24]7 filed a Complaint against LivePerson, alleging infringement of four patents. No. 15-cv-02897, ECF No. 1. Subsequently, [24]7 filed a Complaint against LivePerson on December 7, 2015, alleging infringement of eight other patents. No. 15-cv-05585, ECF No. 1. On January 5, 2016, the Court consolidated the two cases, designated Case No. l5-cv-02897 as the lead case, and ordered all documents to be filed in the lead case. ECF No. 57. 1 On January 7, 2016, [24]7 amended its Complaint for Case No. 15-cv-02897 to allege infringement of a fifth patent. ECF No. 63. As a result of a Court-ordered reduction in the number of asserted claims, the Court, pursuant to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.