Culpepper

California ex rel. TIG Insurance Co. v. Culpepper

Good Law
235 F. Supp. 3d 1121·2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 188055
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 13, 2016Case No.: SACV 16-01555-CJC(JCGx)California2,578 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Carney, J.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff TIG Insurance Company (“TIG”), successor by merger to Fairmont Premier Insurance Company (“Fairmont”), brings this qui tam action on behalf of the People of the State of California against Defendants Brad Culpepper and Does 1 through 100, inclusive, for violations of the California Insurance Frauds Prevention Act (“CIFPA”), California Insurance Code *1123 § 1871.7(b). (Dkt. 1 Ex. A [“Compl.”].) Before the Court is Culpepper’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). (Dkt. 11 [“Mot.”].) For the following reasons, the motion is GRANTED.

II. BACKGROUND

On November 2, 2010, Brad Culpepper filed a claim for workers’ compensation benefits against the Chicago Bears before the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (“WCAB”) in Santa Ana, California. (Compl. ¶ 30.) Culpepper claimed to have suffered “cumulative injury” to his. entire body while employed as a professional football player under the National Football League (“NFL”) ten years earlier. (Dkt. 12 [“Opp.”] at 2; Compl. ¶¶ 30, 33.) The claim was based on six games he had played in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.