Polara Engineering, Inc. v. Campbell Co.

Good Law
237 F. Supp. 3d 956·2017 WL 754609·2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27304
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 2017Case No. SA CV 13-00007-DFMCalifornia17,484 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

McCormick, J.

ORDER RE: POSTTRIAL MOTIONS

This matter is before the Court on the parties’ posttrial motions. Defendant Campbell Company (“Campbell”) moves for judgment as a matter of law. Plaintiff Polara Engineering, Inc." (“Polara") moves for > a permanent injunction, a judgment of willfulness and an award of • treble damages, a finding of exceptional circumstances and a corresponding award of attorney’s fees, and an award of supplemental damages, prejudgment interest, and postjudgment interest.

I.

BACKGROUND

Polara filed this patent-infringement suit against Campbell on January 2, 2013. Dkt. 1. Polara, a manufacturer of accessible pedestrian signal systems and pedestrian push buttons, alleged that Campbell was infringing on Polara’s United States Patent No. 7, 145,476. (the “’476 Patent”). Id. at 2. The ’476 Patent, issued in December 2006, was for a “2-wire push button station control system for a traffic light controlled intersection.” Id at 3. Polara alleged that Campbell, a manufacturer of traffic-industry products, had developed an “Advisor Advanced Accessible Pedestrian Station,” or “AAPS,” that infringed the ’476 Patent. Id.

Polara moved for summary judgment of infringement of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.