Blight

Blight v. City of Manteca

Good Law
240 F. Supp. 3d 1047·2016 WL 6599814·2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154445
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 7, 2016No. 2:15-cv-2513 WBS ACCalifornia3,010 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Claire, J.

ORDER

Plaintiffs pending Motion To Compel (ECF No. 13) was referred to the undersigned by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(1). The discovery dispute involves a Search Warrant that authorized the Manteca police to search 5858 E Carpenter Rd. Stockton, CA 95215. That location was described as:

ECF No. 20-3 at 16 (Exhibit A to the Search Warrant) (emphasis added). However, in addition to searching the modular home at 5858 E Carpenter Rd, the police searched the modular home at 5846 E Carpenter Rd. Plaintiff, a 74-year-old woman, lived at the latter address. 1 According to plaintiff, the police broke down her door, entered her home, seized her, detained her on the street, and searched her home.

In relation to plaintiffs civil rights claims arising from the search, she seeks discovery about and from the Confidential Informant (“CI”) who provided the information upon which the Search Warrant was based. Plaintiff seeks “Exhibit C” to the Search Warrant affidavit, and testimony from defendant Garcia about what the CI told him. For the reasons that are set forth below, the undersigned will grant plaintiffs. motion in part, but will limit discovery to tightly controlled “Attorneys’…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.