Kirk

Kirk v. Berryhill

Good Law
244 F. Supp. 3d 1077·2017 WL 1075493·2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41832
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 22, 2017No. 2:13-cv-2571-EFBCalifornia3,236 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Brennan, J.

ORDER

Plaintiff moves for an award of attorneys’ fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (d)(1). ECF No. 30. She seeks fees based on 95.7 hours of work performed by attorney Barbara Rizzo at a rate of $190.06 per hour. She seeks costs in the amount of $114.10. Id, at 2. Plaintiff also seeks an additional 10 hours at $190.06 for reviewing and preparing a reply to defendant’s opposition to her fee motion, for a total amount of $20,089.34. ECF No. 33 at 14. Defendant argues that plaintiff is not entitled to reasonable attorney fees under the EAJA because the Commissioner’s position was substantially justified. ECF No. 32. Alternatively, she argues that the number of hours sought is unreasonable and should be reduced accordingly. Id.

I. Substantial Justification

The EAJA provides that a prevailing party other than the United States should be awarded fees and other expenses incurred by that party in any civil action brought by or against the United States, “unless the court finds that the position of the United States was substantially justified or that special circumstances make an award unjust.” 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (d)(1). “[T]he ‘position of the United…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.