20 Employee Benefits Cas. 2321, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9461, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 15,545, Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23930u Joseph Rosenbaum, M.D., Inc., Defined Benefit Pension Plan Joseph Rosenbaum, as Administrator and Trustee of the Joseph Rosenbaum, M.D., Inc., Defined Benefit Pension Plan v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company

Good Law
104 F.3d 258
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 27, 199694-55579California2,956 words

Opinion

Opinion

104 F.3d 258 20 Employee Benefits Cas. 2321 , 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9461, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 15 ,545, Pens. Plan Guide (CCH) P 23930U JOSEPH ROSENBAUM, M.D., INC., Defined Benefit Pension Plan; Joseph Rosenbaum, as Administrator and Trustee of the Joseph Rosenbaum, M.D., Inc., Defined Benefit Pension Plan, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-55579. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 13, 1995. Decided Dec. 27, 1996. Michael A. Vanic, Reish & Luftman, Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiffs-appellants. David T. DiBiase, Anderson, McPharlin & Conners, Los Angeles, CA, for defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Irving Hill, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-93-02733-IH. Before: HUG, Chief Judge, BEEZER, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge: 1 This case deals with the scope of an employee dishonesty bond issued to an Employment Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) plan. The district court granted summary judgment on the grounds that there was a concealment that would void the coverage. We affirm, but…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.