In re Experian Information Solutions Credit Reporting Litigation

Good Law
247 F. Supp. 3d 1111·2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46601
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 28, 2017No. C 16-05674 WHA, No. C 16-05676 WHA, No. C 16-05679 WHA, No. C 16-05694 WHA, No. C 16-05701 WHA, No. C 16-05704 WHA, No. C 16-06315 WHA, No. C 16-06335 WHA, No. C 16-06363 WHA, No. C 16-06372 WHACalifornia581 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Alsup, J.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (IN ALL OF THE ABOVE-LISTED CASES)

This order holds that under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. 1681 et seq., a report of a debt may be stated at the full unpaid balance even if the debt is subject to a confirmed Chapter 13 plan wherein- the debt will be discharged if and when a specified lesser amount is paid. Under the Bankruptcy Act, the full debt remains undischarged until, if ever, the specified amount is actually paid. So it remains correct to inform the world at large via the credit report of the full unpaid balance. Since the risk persists that the debtor will fail to pay under the Chapter 13 plan, it would be misleading to future creditors to report, as plaintiffs’ counsel insists in all of these cases, the lesser amount. That would be getting the cart before the horse. First, the debtor must perform as specified under the plan, then get a discharge. At that point, the debt will go to zero.

Although our court of appeals has not yet ruled on the issue, every single district judge who has ruled has held as above. This order adopts this reasoning, including at least two cases rejecting plaintiffs’ main decision In re…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.