Cabardo

Cabardo v. Patacsil

Bad Law
248 F. Supp. 3d 1002·2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49697
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 2017No. 2:12-cv-01705-TLN-KJNCalifornia5,194 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Nunley, J.

ORDER

This is a lawsuit asserting claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq., and several California wage-and-hour laws. The matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. 1 (ECF No. 44.) Defendants Marilyn Patacsil (“Marilyn”) and Ernesto Patacsil (collectively “Defendants”) oppose the motion. (ECF No. 49.) For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ motion is GRANTED in part.

I. Background

Plaintiffs are former employees of Pa-tacsil Care Homes, a group of residential care homes owned and operated by Defendants. Plaintiffs were “live-in” caregivers at the homes, which, as the name suggests, means they lived and worked onsite.

The gravamen of Plaintiffs’ complaint is straightforward: they contend that Defendants misclassified them as exempt from minimum wage and overtime requirements under both federal and California law. (ECF No. 21 at ¶ 26-28.) Plaintiffs brought a suite of claims in this lawsuit—alleging that Defendants violated several federal and state wage-and-hour laws for conduct like not paying Plaintiffs minimum wage or overtime, not providing meal periods or rest periods, not providing accurate and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.