Flores

Flores v. Velocity Express, LLC

Good Law
250 F. Supp. 3d 468·82 Cal. Comp. Cases 499·2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62124
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 24, 2017Case No.12-cv-05790-JSTCalifornia15,110 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Tigar, J.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Re: ECF No. 241

Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment as to misclassi-fication and willfulness. ECF No. 241. The Court will grant the motion in its entirety.

I. BACKGROUND

In this collective action, Plaintiffs allege that Defendants violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) and California law by misclassifying their drivers as independent contractors. The following facts are undisputed except where noted.

A. Defendants

Beginning in December 2009, Defendant Velocity Express, LLC (“Velocity”) began operating its delivery logistics, freight forwarding, and brokering business. Wheeler Deck, ECF No. 44-1 at 3, ¶ 3. In its standard services proposal to its customers, Velocity described itself as “America’s largest national ground shipping provider dedicated exclusively to regional delivery.” ECF No. 242-6 at 2. Velocity’s managerial employees testified that Velocity was primarily a delivery business. See Curcuru Depo., ECF No. 242-12 at 70-71 (characterizing Velocity’s business as “[delivering product to the end user”); Healey Depo., ECF No. 242-16 at 4-6 (affirming that “the general…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.