Brown

Brown v. County of San Bernardino

Good Law
250 F. Supp. 3d 568·2017 WL 1398639·2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59250
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 17, 2017NO. ED CV 15-294-CJC(E)California10,908 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Carney, J.

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636 , the Court has reviewed the Third Amended Complaint, all of the records herein and the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which any objections have been made. The Court accepts and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation.

IT IS ORDERED that Judgment shall be entered in favor of Defendants.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve forthwith a copy of this Order, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and the Judgment of this date on Plaintiff and counsel for Defendants.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This Report and Recommendation is submitted to the Honorable Cormac J. Carney, United States District Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636 and General Order 06-07 of the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

BACKGROUND

On February 19, 2015, Plaintiff filed a pro se civil rights Complaint for damages pursuant to 42 U.S.C.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.