Messano

Messano v. Experian Info. Solutions, Inc.

Good Law
251 F. Supp. 3d 1309·2017 WL 1957052·2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70111
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 8, 2017Case No. 16-CV-05697-HSGCalifornia3,326 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Gilliam, J.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT EQUIFAX’S MOTION TO DISMISS

Re: Dkt. No.

Pending before the Court is the motion to dismiss filed by Defendant' Equifax, Inc. (“Equifax”). Dkt. No. 27 (“Mot.”). Plaintiff Lisa Messano alleges that Equifax violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”). Dkt. No. 1 (“Compl.”). Plaintiff filed an opposition to Equifax’s motion to dismiss, Dkt. No. 41 (“Opp.”), and Equifax replied, Dkt. No. 46 (“Reply”). Having considered the parties’ submissions, the Court.finds the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Civil L.R. 7—1(b). For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Equifax’s motion to dismiss with prejudice in part'and with leave to amend in part.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Factual History

For purpose of this motion, the Court accepts the following facts as true.

On February 9, 2012, Plaintiff pulled a credit report from third-party vendor CIN Legal Data Services (“CIN”). Compl. ¶¶ 87-88. The credit report from CIN was compiled from information gathered by the three major credit reporting agencies (“CRAs”): Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (“Experian”), Equifax, and TransUnion, LLC (“TransUnion”).- Id. ¶89. This credit report…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.