Conde

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS

(ECF Nos. 80, 81)

Presently before the Court are two sets of Motions to Dismiss and corresponding briefing. The first set are Defendants Don Ressler’s, Adam Goldenberg’s, Kristin Chadwick’s, IB Holding, LLC’s, and Tech-style, Inc.’s (together, “Primary Defendants”) Motion to Strike and Dismiss the Third Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint (“Mot. to Dismiss”), (ECF No. 81), Plaintiffs Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss (“Opp’n”), (ECF No. 86), and Primary Defendants’ Reply in Support of the Motion to Dismiss (“Reply”), (ECF No. 89). The second set are Defendants John Drew’s and TCV VI, L.P.’s (together, “TCV Defendants”) Motion to Strike Certain Allegations in the Third Consolidated Amended Complaint and to Dismiss the Third Consolidated Amended Complaint (“Non-Opp. Mot. to Dismiss”), (ECF No. 80), Plaintiffs Non-Opposition to the Non-Opposed Motion to Dismiss (“Non-Opp’n”), (ECF No. 87), and TCV Defendants’ Response to Plaintiffs Statement of Non-Opposition (“Non-Opp’n Reply”), (ECF No. 88). The Court vacated the hearing on these Motions and took the matters under submission without oral argument…