Eisenbise

ORDER:

(1)DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE FRED SMITH, (Doc. No. 59);

(2) DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE EUGENE VANDERPOL II, (Doc. No. 62);

(3) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE MICHAEL FREEMAN, (Doc. No. 61); AND

(4) DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, (Doc. Nos. 63, 65)

Presently before the Court are Defendant Crown Equipment Corporation’s *1255 (“Crown”) three motions to exclude Plaintiffs Nathan Eisenbise’s (“Nathan”) and Jeniffer Eisenbise’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) experts, (Doc. Nos. 59, 61, 62), as well as Crown’s motion for summary judgment, (Doc. Nos. 63, 65). Plaintiffs oppose all four motions. (Doc. Nos. 69-71, 81.) A hearing on the motions to exclude was held on May 11, 2017. As set forth below, the Court DENIES Crown’s motions to exclude Smith and Vanderpol and GRANTS Crown’s motion to exclude Dr. Freeman.

At the hearing, the parties discussion also addressed issues key to Crown’s summary judgment motion. Having considered those arguments, as well as those contained in the parties’ moving papers, and pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.1.d.l, the Court finds the matter suitable for decision without further oral argument.…