Schutza

Schutza v. Cuddeback

Bad Law
262 F. Supp. 3d 1025
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 10, 2017Case No. 16-cv-02746-BAS-KSCCalifornia2,498 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Honbashant, J.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS STATE LAW CLAIM [ECF No. 5]

On November 07, 2016, Plaintiff Scott Schutza commenced this civil action against Defendants William Cuddeback, Lou Cuddeback, and Interstate Group, LLC (“Defendants”) alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 , et seq. (“ADA”), and California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act §§ 51-53 (“Unruh .Act”). Defendants now move to dismiss the state law claim .for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1367 . Plaintiff has not opposed.

The Court finds this motion suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); CivLR 7.1(d)(1).. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiffs state law claim. 2 (ECF No. 5.) •

1. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Scott Schutza is a paraplegic who uses a wheelchair for mobility. (Compl. 111.) Defendants own the real property known as “TrailersPlus” located at or about 12024 Woodside Avenue, Lakeside, California. (Id. ¶¶ 2-5.)

In February 20Í6, Plaintiff went to TrailersPlus in search of a trailer. (Id. ¶ 10.) However, as a result of his physical…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.