S.H.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Re: Dkt. Nos. 28, 29-

I. INTRODUCTION

In this action, Plaintiff S.H. seeks judicial review of an administrative decision of California’s Office of Administrative Hearings '(‘‘OAH”) under' the Individuals, with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq, Presently before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment by S.H, and the Mount Diablo Unified School District. A hearing- on the motions was held on June 2,; 2017. Following the hearing, the parties filed supplemental briefs addressing the question of what remedy the Court should award if it found that S.H. was entitled to summary judgment with respect to any of the alleged errors on the par,t of the OAH. For the reasons stated below, the, Court GRANTS Plaintiffs Motion for Summary judgment (“Plaintiff s, Motion”) and DENIES Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Defendant’s Motion”). The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (c).

II. BACKGROUND

This case involves challenges to an Individualized Educational…