Kaldis

Kaldis v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Good Law
263 F. Supp. 3d 856
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 23, 2017Case No. 2:16-cv-06407-ODW(GJSx)California5,807 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Wright, J.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [19]

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff. Angela Kaldis, a former employee of Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., alleges that her supervisors harassed her during her employment and that Wells Fargo wrongfully terminated her employment. Before the Court is Wells Fargo’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 19.) For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS the Motion. 1 •

*859 II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

In August 2012, Wells Fargo hired Plaintiff as a personal banker at its branch in Pacific Palisades, California. (Statement of Undisputed Facts (“SUF”) ¶1, ECF No. 23; Statement of Additional Material Facts (“AMF”) ¶ 1, ECF No. 27.) Beginning in April 2013, Plaintiff reported directly to branch manager Najla Rabadi. (SUF ¶ 3; AMF ¶ 6.) Sarah Majidian, the branch’s service manager, oversaw all bank tellers at the branch — including Plaintiff — but Plaintiff did not directly report to her. (SUF ¶ 4.)

According to Plaintiff, Rabadi made several offensive comments to her about her weight and eating habits. (AMF ¶¶ 8-14.) 2 Plaintiff also believed that Rabadi treated her worse than her male colleagues. That is, Rabadi would “yell and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.