Letizia

Letizia v. Facebook Inc.

Good Law
267 F. Supp. 3d 1235
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 14, 2017Case No. 16-cv-06232-TEHCalifornia7,996 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Henderson, J.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART FACEBOOK’S MOTION TO DISMISS

Presently before the Court is Defendant Facebook, Inc.’s (“Facebook”) motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ consolidated class action complaint. ECF No. 46 (“Mot.”). Plaintiffs timely opposed the motion, ECF No. 54 (“Opp’n”), and Facebook timely replied, .ECF No. 56 (“Reply”); Facebook also filed a request for judicial notice in support of its motion to dismiss. See ECF No. 47. The Court heard oral arguments on Facebook’s motion and request on June 19, 2017. See ECF No. 61. After carefully considering the parties’ written and oral- arguments, the Court hereby GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Facebook’s motion and request for judicial notice for the reasons set forth below.

I. BACKGROUND

The following factual allegations are taken from Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint, ECF No. 34 (“Compl.”),, unless otherwise stated, and are therefore accepted as true for the purposes of this motion. See Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555-56 , 127 S.Ct. 1955 , 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007).

Facebook, Inc. operates Facebook.com, a social media service with 1.79 billion monthly active users. Compl. ¶¶…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.