Ng
United States v. Ng
Opinion
Lead Opinion
Chhabria, J.
ORDER ON MOTIONS IN LIMINE AND MICHAEL PON’S MOTION FOR DISCOVERY
Re: Dkt. Nos. 141, 145, 146, 147, 148
For the reasons given at the pretrial conference, the following rulings apply to the motions in limine:
Ng’s Motion in Limine No.
The motion to exclude Lino’s August 5, 2014 statement to the police is granted.
Ng’s Motion in Limine No.
The motion to exclude Ng’s prior convictions is granted.
Pen’s Motion in Limine
The motion is granted with respect to Lino’s August 5, 2014 statement to the police. Should Ng decline to testify, Ng’s August 5 statement to the police cannot be used against Pon. Statements made by Lino to the undercover officer after April 23, 2014 are not admissible against Pon.
Government Motion in Limine No.
The motion to preclude reference to punishment is granted to the extent discussed at the pretrial conference.
Government Motion in Limine No.
The motion is granted to the extent the government seeks to limit opening statements to description of facts that counsel intends to prove.
Government Motion in Limine No.
The motion is granted to the extent that the defendants seek to introduce evidence they were required to produce in…