GemCap Lending, LLC v. Quarles & Brady, LLP

Good Law
269 F. Supp. 3d 1007
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 2017CV 14-07937-RSWL-ExCalifornia14,562 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Ronaldlew, J.

ORDER re:

1. Defendants Quarles .& Brady LLP and James Gatziolis’ Motion for Summary Judgment or Partial Summary Judgment [116];

2. Plaintiff GemCap Lending I, LLC’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment[120];

3. Plaintiffs Motion to Strike Robert ,, L. Kehr’s Expert Report. [113];

4.Defendants’ Motion to Strike Stanley W. Lamport’s Expert Report [114];

5.Defendants’ Motion to Strike Portions of Douglas E, Johnston, Jr.’s Expert Report [115]

Currently before Court are the following Motions: (1) Defendants Quarles & Brady LLP and James Gatziolis’ Motion for Summary Judgment or Partial Summary Judgment [116]; and (2) Plaintiff GemCap Lending I, LLC’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [120]. 1 Defendants’ Motion arises out of Plaintiffs action against Defendants for professional malpractice, intentional misrepresentation, negligent misrepresentation, and concealment under California law-. Plaintiffs Motion relates to the latter three causes of action only. Having reviewed all papers submitted pertaining to these Motions, the Court NOW FINDS AND RULES AS FOLLOWS: the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motion. The Court DENIES Plaintiffs Motion.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Factual Background

1.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.