hiQ Labs, Inc. v. LinkedIn Corp.

Good Law
273 F. Supp. 3d 1099
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 14, 2017Case No. 17-cv-03301-EMCCalifornia10,595 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Chen, J.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

Docket No.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff hiQ initiated this action after Defendant Linkedln issued a cease and desist letter and attempted to terminate hiQ’s ability to access otherwise publicly available information on profiles of Linked-ln users. The letter threatens action under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA). Linkedln also employed various blocking techniques designed to prevent hiQ’s automated data collection methods. Linkedln brought this action after years of tolerating hiQ’s access and use of its data.

hiQ’s business involves providing information to businesses about their workforces based on statistical analysis of publicly available data, Its data .analytics business is wholly dependent on Linked-In’s public data. hiQ contends that Link-edln’s actions constitute unfair business practices under Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17200 et seq. hiQ also raises a number of common law tort and contract claims, including intentional interference with contract and promissory estoppel, and further contends that Linkedln’s actions constitute a violation of free "speech under the California Constitution. ’

Now…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.