Aparicio

Aparicio v. Comcast, Inc.

Good Law
274 F. Supp. 3d 1014
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 11, 2017Case No. 16-cv-03952-JSTCalifornia8,652 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

ORDER GRANTING-IN-PART AND DENYING-IN-PART MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Re: ECF No.

Before the Court is Defendant Comcast Cable Communication Management, LLC’s (“Comcast”)' Motion for Summary Judgment. ECF No. 44. The Court will grant the motion in part and deny it in part,

I. BACKGROUND

This is an. action for employment discrimination, Plaintiff Jorge F. Aparicio asserts claims under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”), Cal. Gov. Code § 12940 (a), for disability discrimination, failure to accommodate, failure to engage, in an interactive process, failure to prevent discrimination, retaliation, and race and national origin discrimination, and a claim for wrongful termination in violation of California public policy. ECF No. 1-1 (“Compl.”) at 2-3.

A. Factual Background

1. Mr. Aparicio’s Early Employment

Mr. Aparicio was employed by Comcast and its predecessor, AT & T, from 2000 until his termination in September 2014. ECF No. 44-1 at 27; ECF No. 67-3 at 2. Mr. Aparicio is a native of El Salvador and moved to the United States in. 1990. ECF No. 44-1 at 26. He was initially hired as an installer trainee in the Burlingame, California office. Id. He was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.