Gilbane Federal v. United Infrastructure Projects FZCO

Good Law
275 F. Supp. 3d 1180
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 11, 2017Case No. 14-cv-03254-VCCalifornia8,599 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Chhabria, J.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

I. FINDINGS OF FACT

Background

1. Gilbane Federal is a California corporation with headquarters in Walnut Creek. Dkt. No. 193 at 10. Ernie Hogue was a Gilbane project manager and Brett *1182 Davis was a Gilbane construction manager during most of the events giving rise to the parties’ dispute. Tr. at 7-8,175.

2. UIP FZCO (“UIP”) is a foreign corporation registered and headquartered in Dubai. Dkt. No. 193 at 10. Mazin Sadiq was UIP’s CEO and Wail Sadiq was General Manager during most of the events giving rise to the parties’ dispute. Tr. at 328-29.

3. UIP Lebanon is a foreign corporation registered in Lebanon and headquartered in Beirut. Dkt. No. 193 at 11.

4. UIP Djibouti is a foreign corporation registered and headquartered in Djibouti. Id.

5. The United States Navy, which is not a party to this action, was responsible for administering Gilbane’s contract through Naval Facilities Engineering Command Pacific (“NAVFAC”). Id. Dave Ebmeier is the former Navy employee partly responsible for creating the Navy’s project specifications. Tr. at 220-21. He retired from the Navy at the end of 2013 and went to work for Kinney Electrical…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.