Patterson

United States v. Patterson

Good Law
276 F. Supp. 3d 994
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 4, 2017Case No.: 16-cr-2558-BTMCalifornia5,575 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Moskowitz, J.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS

Presently before the Court is Defendant Kirk Patterson’s motion to suppress evi *998 dence. (Def.’s Mot. to Suppress (“Def.’s MTS”), EOF No. 33.) The Court held an evidentiary hearing on June 21, 2017 and final arguments on July 14, 2017. For the reasons discussed below, Defendant’s motion is GRANTED.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

On July 15, 2015, Probation Officers (“PO”) Erich Schmidt, with the assistance of POs Adam Stanton, Carlos Gomez and Omar Pazarin, searched apartment No. 3 located at 5945 Streamview Drive 1 in San Diego, California. (Tr. of Evidentiary Hr’g, ECF No. 26, 7:25-8:2.) In January 2015, PO Schmidt was assigned to Kenneth Miller’s (“Miller”) case, an individual on parole and subject to a Fourth Amendment search waiver. (Tr. 7:21-24; 20:19-21:7.) Miller had previously disclosed a false address, which led PO Schmidt to investigate Miller’s place of residence. (Tr. 8:20-24; 9:7-10.) On June 19, 2015, San Diego Police arrested Miller in front of 5935 Streamview Drive. (Tr. 9:13-17; 29:14-29:17; 31:22-32:7.) Miller was incarcerated for giving PO Schmidt a false address and while in jail, PO Schmidt monitored his phone calls.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.