Realini

MH Pillars Ltd. v. Realini

Good Law
277 F. Supp. 3d 1077
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 14, 2017Case No. 15-cv-1383-PJHCalifornia13,793 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hamilton, J.

ORDER RE MOTIONS TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Defendants’-motions to dismiss the first amended complaint (“FAC”) for failure to state a claim came on for hearing before this court on June 14, 2017. Plaintiffs MH Pillars Ltd. (“MHP-UK”) and MH Pillars Inc. (“MHP-USA”) appeared by - their counsel Peter Fredman. Defendants Carol Realini (“Realini”), Rodney Robinson (“Robinson”), Christopher Martin (“Martin”), and Ultralight Inc., f/k/a Obopay; Inc. (“Obopay”) appeared by their counsel Lee Marshall and Alexandra Whitworth. Defendant Accelerated Commerce Solutions, Inc. (“ACS”) appeared by their counsel Patricia Welch and Christopher Kara-gheuzoff.

Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, the court hereby GRANTS the motion of Realini, Robinson, Martin, and Obopay (“Obopay defendants”) in part and DENIES it in part, and GRANTS ACS’s motion, in which the Obopay defendants filed a join-der.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff MHP-UK is a UK corporation that operates an on-line payment service-provider called- “Payza.” FAC ¶¶ 1, 12. Plaintiff MHP-USA is a New York corporation that is a wholly-owned subsidiary of MHP-UK. FAC ¶¶ 2,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.