In re Packaged Seafood Products Antitrust Litigation

Good Law
277 F. Supp. 3d 1167
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 26, 2017Case No.: 15-MD-2670 JLS (MDD)California11,103 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Honsammartino, J.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO DISMISS

(ECF Nos. 408, 409, 412)

Presently before the Court are:

(1) Defendants StarKist Co.’s, Dongwon Industries Co., Ltd.’s, Bumble Bee Foods, LLC’s, Tri-Union Seafoods, LLC’s, Thai Union Group PCL’s, and Del- Monte Corporation’s (“Joint Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss all Plaintiffs’ Complaints 1 for (A) failure to allege any factual allegations supporting a post-2013 packaged tuna conspiracy, (B) improperly claiming an entitlement to discovery concerning non-tuna products, and (C) failing to allege a plausible claim for injunctive relief {“Twombly MTD,” ECF Nos. 408-1, 409-1); and Motion to Dismiss (D) certain of End Payer Plaintiffs (“EPPs”) and Commercial Food Preparer Plaintiffs’ (“CFPs”) state law claims due to failure to comply with the Court’s prior Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants’ Remaining Motions to Dismiss (ECF No. 295), pleadings contrary to dispositive state law, and lack of Article III or statutory standing (“State Law Br.,” ECF No. 409-2); and (2) Defendants StarKist Co.’s, Dongwon Industries Co., Ltd.’s, and Del Monte Corporation’s (“StarKist Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss (A) all…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.