Saravia

Saravia v. Sessions

Good Law
280 F. Supp. 3d 1168
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 20, 2017Case No. 17-cv-03615-VCCalifornia17,098 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Chhabria, J.

ORDER GRANTING THE MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION; GRANTING THE MOTION FOR PROVISIONAL CLASS CERTIFICATION; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THE FEDERAL DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS; GRANTING IN FULL THE NON-FEDERAL DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS

Re: Dkt. No. 51, 54, 58,

The federal government sometimes releases noncitizens on bond or parole while their removal proceedings are pending. Release reflects a determination by the government that the noncitizen is not a danger to the community or a flight risk. Once a noncitizen has been released, the law prohibits federal agents from rearresting him merely because he is subject to removal proceedings. Rather, the federal agents must be able to present evidence of materially changed circumstances — namely, evidence that the noncitizen is in fact dangerous or has become a flight risk, or is now subject to a final order of removal. And if the noncitizen disputes the notion that changed circumstances justify his rearrest, he is entitled to a prompt hearing before an immigration judge. These protections against the erroneous deprivation of liberty arose out of a 1981 decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals and are embodied…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.