Artis

United States v. Artis

Good Law
282 F. Supp. 3d 1202
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 24, 2017Case No. 16–cr–00477–VC–1California2,038 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Chhabria, J.

The question presented by this motion is whether showing a fake i.d. at a shooting range to use the range's guns for target practice can give rise to criminal liability for making a false statement in connection with the acquisition of a firearm from a federally licensed dealer. The answer is no, primarily because a shooting range is not a "licensed dealer" within the meaning of the federal gun control laws.

I.

The government is prosecuting Donnell Artis and his codefendants for a variety of federal crimes. Count three of the superseding indictment charges Artis with making a false statement during the acquisition of a firearm from a licensed dealer in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922 (a)(6). According to the government, Artis went to a shooting range and temporarily obtained guns from the proprietor for use on the premises, even though he is a convicted felon who is barred under federal law from possessing firearms. 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g)(1). The government alleges that Artis showed the proprietor a fake i.d., presumably to avoid creating a paper trail that might later cause the authorities to discover his crime. Artis now moves to dismiss this count, contending that the conduct…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.