State v. Bureau of Land Mgmt.

Good Law
286 F. Supp. 3d 1054
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 22, 2018Case Nos. 17–cv–07186–WHO; 17–cv–07187–WHOCalifornia11,288 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Orrick, J.

INTRODUCTION

This case addresses the burden a federal agency bears when it seeks to suspend a federal regulation for further analysis. Plaintiffs, the States of California and New Mexico, bring this action for a preliminary injunction enjoining the United States Bureau of Land Management ("BLM"), Katherine S. Macgregor, Acting Assistant Secretary for Land and Minerals Management, and Ryan Zinke, Secretary of the Interior, from instituting a rule suspending or delaying the requirements of the Waste Prevention, Production Subject to Royalties, and Resource Conservation Rule. A coalition of 17 conservation and tribal citizen groups separately brought suit for a preliminary injunction against Zinke, the BLM, and the United States Department of the Interior seeking the same preliminary injunction. These two cases have been consolidated for review.

The States of North Dakota and Texas, along with three industry groups, the Western Energy Alliance ("WEA"), Independent Petroleum Association of America ("IPAA"), and American Petroleum Institute ("API"), have moved to intervene in these consolidated actions in opposition to the preliminary injunction. The BLM and the States of North…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.