Pogrebnoy

Pogrebnoy v. Russian Newspaper Distribution, Inc.

Good Law
289 F. Supp. 3d 1061
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 2, 2017CV 10–8532 PA (SSx)California5,386 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Anderson, J.

This action involves allegations of trademark and trade dress infringement asserted by plaintiff Oleg Pogrebnoy ("Pogrebnoy") against defendants Russian Newspaper Distribution, Inc., MMAP, Inc., Vitaly Matusov ("Matusov"), and Alexander Ginzburg ("Ginzburg") (collectively "Defendants") arising out of the publication of a Russian language newspaper titled "Kypbep" in Cyrillic and translated by Pogrebnoy as "courier" in English.

Pogrebnoy, appearing pro se , commenced this action on November 9, 2010. In his First Amended Complaint ("FAC"), Pogrebnoy alleged claims for: (1) trademark infringement under section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125 (a) against Defendants; (2) trade dress infringement under section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125 (a) against Defendants; (3) cancellation of a federal trademark registration for "LAKurier.com" pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1064 against defendants Russian Newspaper Distribution, Inc. and Ginzburg; and (4) unfair competition against Defendants.

The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. In a June 28, 2011 Minute Order, the Court concluded that Pogrebnoy had not provided admissible evidence of the transfer of his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.