In re Myford Touch Consumer Litig.

Good Law
291 F. Supp. 3d 936
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 14, 2018Case No. 13–cv–03072–EMCCalifornia22,673 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Chen, J.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Docket No. 341

The crux of this case is that Ford's infotainment system known as MyFord Touch was allegedly defective. Plaintiffs seek to recover damages on behalf of the certified classes in the form of the diminution in value caused to their vehicles by the defect. Ford now moves for summary judgment on the classwide express and implied warranty claims as well as a number of individual fraud and consumer protection claims. For the reasons below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Ford's motion.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The following claims have been certified for class treatment: Breach of Implied Warranty on behalf of California, Massachusetts, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, and Virginia classes; Breach of Express Warranty on behalf of California and Washington classes; violation of the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act on behalf of the Massachusetts class; negligence under Ohio law; and strict product liability under Colorado law. See Docket No. 279 at 41-43. 1 The classes are defined to include "all persons or entities who purchased or leased a Ford or a Lincoln…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.