Congdon

Congdon v. Uber Techs., Inc.

Good Law
291 F. Supp. 3d 1012
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 8, 2018Case No. 16–cv–02499–YGRCalifornia4,675 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

a. Rules Governing Contract Interpretation

"Interpretation of a contract is a matter of law, as is the determination of whether a contract is ambiguous." Beck Park Apartments v. U.S. Dep't of Housing & Urban Dev. , 695 F.2d 366 , 369 (9th Cir. 1982) ; see also Wolf v. Sup. Ct. , 114 Cal. App. 4th 1343 , 1351, 8 Cal.Rptr.3d 649 (2004). "Under statutory rules of contract interpretation, the mutual intention of the parties at the time the contract is formed governs interpretation." Santisas v. Goodin , 17 Cal. 4th 599 , 608, 71 Cal.Rptr.2d 830 , 951 P.2d 399 (1998) (citing Cal. Civ. Code § 1636 ). When a court interprets a contract to determine the parties' intent, "[t]he whole of [the] contract is to be taken together, so as to give effect to every part, if reasonably practicable, each clause helping to interpret the other." Lockyer v. R.J. Reynolds , 107 Cal.App.4th 516 , 525, 132 Cal.Rptr.2d 151 (2003) ; see also Cal. Civ. Code § 1641 .

The "clear and explicit meaning" of contractual provisions "interpreted in their ordinary and popular sense, unless used by the parties in a technical sense or a special meaning is given to them by usage, controls judicial interpretation."…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.