Luna

Luna v. Cnty. of Kern

Good Law
291 F. Supp. 3d 1088
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 2018No. 1:16–cv–00568–DAD–JLTCalifornia26,043 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Drozd, J.

On April 22, 2016, plaintiffs, who are Latino 1 citizens and registered voters in Kern County, commenced this action against the County of Kern, its Board of Supervisors, and other County officials (collectively, "defendants"), challenging Kern County's 2011 redistricting plan under § 2 of the Voting Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1973 . Plaintiffs allege that the County's 2011 redistricting plan impermissibly dilutes the Latino vote in Kern County and thereby denies Latinos the opportunity to elect representatives of their choice. After the court denied plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. No. 79), the action proceeded to an eleven-day bench trial, which concluded on December 19, 2017.

At trial, plaintiffs offered the testimony of three experts. 2 David Ely, plaintiffs' demography *1098 expert, testified that a second majority-Latino supervisorial district in Kern County could have been created in 2011. Dr. Morgan Kousser, plaintiffs' statistical expert, testified regarding the presence of racially polarized voting in Kern County. Finally, Dr. Albert Camarillo, plaintiffs' expert historian, testified about the history of discrimination against Latinos in Kern County…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.