Peevey

Winding Creek Solar LLC v. Peevey

Good Law
293 F. Supp. 3d 980
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 6, 2017Case No. 13–cv–04934–JDCalifornia7,655 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Donato, J.

Plaintiff Winding Creek Solar LLC has sued the Commissioners of the California Public Utilities Commission ("CPUC") for a declaration that three CPUC orders conflict with federal law and consequently violate the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution. The CPUC orders set up a procurement program called "Re-MAT" (short for "Renewable Market-Adjusting Tariff"), and regulate the terms on which utility companies like the Pacific Gas and Electric Company ("PG & E") must purchase power from alternative energy power production facilities like small wind farms and solar projects. Winding Creek intends to build such a solar project in Lodi, California, and it seeks a long-term contract to sell the energy from the proposed facility to PG & E. It sued because it believes the CPUC orders in dispute prevented it from getting a contract entitlement under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act ("PURPA").

This order brings to a close a case that has been fought hard over a number of years. After three rounds of motions to dismiss, the parties filed cross-requests for summary judgment which were heavily briefed and included submission of an amicus brief from PG & E and other…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.