Henstooth Ranch LLC v. Burlington Ins. Co.

Good Law
293 F. Supp. 3d 1067
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 2018Case No. 17–cv–00006–SICalifornia4,083 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Illston, J.

This is an insurance coverage dispute. Plaintiff Henstooth Ranch, LLC moves for partial summary judgment, seeking a declaration that defendant The Burlington Insurance Company has a duty to defend Henstooth in an underlying action. Pl.'s Mot. (Dkt. No. 40). Burlington filed a cross-motion for summary judgment in its favor. Def.'s Mot. (Dkt. No. 45-1). After considering the parties' materials and arguments, the Court DENIES plaintiff's motion and GRANTS defendant's cross-motion.

BACKGROUND

Burlington is an insurance company with administrative offices in North Carolina. Complaint (Dkt. No. 1-1). Henstooth is a limited liability corporation organized under California law. Declaration of Peter Thompson (Dkt. No. 40-3) ¶ 2. Toni and Peter Thompson are officers of Henstooth. Id. ¶ 3. Henstooth owns certain property in Santa Rosa, California ("Henstooth Property"). Id. ¶ 4. Adjacent to the Henstooth Property is a parcel personally owned by the Thompsons and subject to a conservation easement held by the Sonoma Land Trust ("SLT") ("the Easement Property"). 1 Id. ¶¶ 5-6.

Henstooth filed this lawsuit seeking declaratory relief concerning Burlington's duty to defend and indemnify…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.