Townsend

Townsend v. Monster Beverage Corp.

Good Law
303 F. Supp. 3d 1010
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 20, 2018ED CV 12–2188–VAP (KKx)California20,176 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Order (1) DENYING in part and GRANTING in part Defendants' Motion to Strike Stefan Boedeker's Expert Report and Testimony, (Doc. No. 109);

(2) DENYING in part and GRANTING in part Defendants' Motion to Strike Thomas Maronick's Expert Report and Testimony, (Doc. No. 110);

(3) DENYING in part and GRANTING in part Plaintiffs' Motion to Exclude Kent Van Liere's Expert Report, (Doc. No. 129);

(4) DENYING in part and GRANTING in part Plaintiffs' Motion to Exclude Keith Ugone's Expert Report, (Doc. No. 137 (redacted); Doc. No. 150 (unredacted) );

(5) DENYING Plaintiffs' Motion to Exclude Eva Lilja's Declaration, (Doc. No. 130);

(6) DENYING Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification, (Doc. No. 95)

Virginia A. Phillips, United States District Judge *1016 On June 26, 2017, Plaintiffs Matthew Townsend and Ted Cross (collectively, "Plaintiffs") filed their Motion for Class Certification. (Doc. No. 95 ("Motion").) Defendants Monster Beverage Corporation and Monster Energy Company (collectively, "Defendants" or "Monster") opposed the Motion on October 31, 2017, (Doc. No. 122 ("Opposition") ), and Plaintiffs replied on December 5, 2017, (Doc. No. 126 (Reply"); Doc. No. 134). Both parties…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.