Arnold W. Larsen, an Individual v. Town of Corte Madera, a Governmental Entity

104 F.3d 365 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Arnold W. LARSEN, an individual, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOWN OF CORTE MADERA, a governmental entity, Defendant-Appellee. No. 96-15712. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 16, 1996. * Decided Dec. 20, 1996. Before: SNEED, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Arnold W. Larsen appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of the Town of Corte Madera ("Town") in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action in which Larsen sought a declaratory judgment that the Town violated his right to equal protection by denying his applications to build an addition onto the roof of his house. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review the district court's summary judgment de novo. Kawaoka v. City of Arroyo Grande, 17 F.3d 1227, 1234 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 193 (1994). 4 To establish an equal protection claim based upon local land…