Briseno v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
104 F.3d 365·1996 WL 740832·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 37757
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 20, 199695-56296California190 words

Opinion

Opinion

104 F.3d 365 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Theodore J. BRISENO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES; Willie Williams, Chief of Police; Darryl Gates; Val Panacia, Captain, individually & in his official capacity; R.J. Martin, Captain, individually & in his official capacity; F.X. Pegueros, Captain, individually & in his official capacity; Corrie Malinka, Sergeant, individually & in her official capacity; Harold Clifton, Lt., individually & in his official capacity; and Rita Knecht, Lt., individually & in her official capacity, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-56296. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 9, 1996. Decided Dec. 20, 1996. Before: PREGERSON, D.W. NELSON and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 ORDER * 2 The district court's order entered August 3, 1995 is affirmed for the reasons set forth therein. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.