Martinez v. Neilson

Good Law
104 F.3d 365·1996 WL 740858·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 37750
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 20, 199696-15246California610 words

Opinion

Opinion

104 F.3d 365 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Marshall MARTINEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Janice NEILSON, H.C.F. Supervisor of Law Library, individually and in her official capacity; Deanna Espinas, H.C.F. Library Services Officer, individually and in her official capacity; George Sumner, Director of Public Safety, State of Hawaii; Edwin Shimoda, Division Administrator of H.C.F., individually and in his official capacity; John Smythe, Administrator of H.C.F., individually and in his official capacity, Defendants-Appellees. No. 96-15246. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 16, 1996. * Decided Dec. 20, 1996. Before: SNEED, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Marshall Martinez, a Hawaii state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's judgment following a bench trial and partial summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Martinez alleges that defendants violated his right of access to the courts, and his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.