Krolop v. Silverstein
Opinion
Opinion
104 F.3d 365 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Linda KROLOP, Plaintiff, Daryl Rice; Lifetime Nutrition Company; Cheryl Swager, Defendants-Counterclaimants-Appellants, v. Steven A. SILVERSTEIN, Counterdefendant-Appellee. No. 95-56360. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 9, 1996. * Decided Dec. 20, 1996. Before: PREGERSON, D.W. NELSON, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 We must decide whether summary judgment in favor of Steven Silverstein was proper with respect to Daryl Rice's claims of copyright infringement, breach of fiduciary duty, intentional misrepresentation, and other causes of action. Because the parties are familiar with the facts, we will not reiterate them here. 3 * Rice's direct copyright infringement claim fails because he has not provided specific facts from which a reasonable jury could infer that Silverstein was involved in any infringing activity. Rice's theory that Silverstein was secretly…