Paul Hardy v. City of Glendale Officer Dekruff Sgt. Barnes Mr. Peatrowsky Glendale Humane Society Officer Muzquiz Officer Bernsten

104 F.3d 365 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Paul HARDY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF GLENDALE; Officer Dekruff; Sgt. Barnes; Mr. Peatrowsky; Glendale Humane Society; Officer Muzquiz; Officer Bernsten, Defendants-Appellees. No. 96-55246. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 5, 1996. * Decided Dec. 20, 1996. Before: PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Paul Hardy appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of the City of Glendale, the Glendale Humane Society, several Glendale police officers, and several Glendale Humane Society officers in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that the police and humane society officers violated Hardy's constitutional rights by seizing Hardy's dog, Shane, from its kennel at Hardy's apartment complex and by refusing to release Shane to Hardy for more than two days. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo…