McClure v. City of Long Beach

Good Law
104 F.3d 365·1996 WL 740816
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 20, 199694-56772California2,631 words

Opinion

Opinion

104 F.3d 365 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Shirley McCLURE; Jason McClure, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF LONG BEACH, Defendant, and Jeffrey Kellogg; Raymond Grabinski; Eugene J. Zeller; Clifford Ashton; William Gatoff; Martin Deangelo; Harold Liddicoat; Mark Sutton, Defendants-Appellants. No. 94-56772. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 16, 1995. Decided June 28, 1996. Withdrawn Dec. 20, 1996. 1 C.D.Cal. 2 DISMISSED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART. 3 Appeal from the United States District Court, for the Central District of California, D.C. No. CV-92-2776-JSL (JK); Spencer J. Letts, District Judge, Presiding. 4 Before: HALL and NOONAN, Circuit Judges, and PRO, * District Judge. ORDER 5 The memorandum disposition filed on June 28, 1996, is hereby withdrawn and the attached 11-page amended memorandum disposition is filed in its stead. 6 The panel has voted to deny appellees' petition for rehearing. Judges Hall and Noonan…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.