Wiese

Wiese v. Becerra

Good Law
306 F. Supp. 3d 1190
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 6, 2018Civ. No. 2:17–903 WBS KJNCalifornia6,381 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Shubb, J.

*1194 Before the court is defendants' Motion to dismiss plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint. (Docket No. 61.) The court held a hearing on the Motion on February 5, 2018.

I. Factual and Procedural History

This case concerns a challenge to California's prohibition on the possession of gun magazines that can hold more than ten bullets, or "large capacity" magazines ("LCM"). 1 Although California had banned the purchase, sale, transfer, receipt, or manufacture of such magazines since 2000, it did not ban the possession of these magazines. Fyock v. City of Sunnyvale , 779 F.3d 991 , 994 (9th Cir. 2015). In effect, Californians were allowed to keep large capacity magazines they had obtained prior to 2000, but no one, with a few exceptions such as law enforcement officers, has been allowed to obtain new large capacity magazines since 2000.

On July 1, 2016, California enacted Senate Bill 1446 ("SB 1446"), which amended California Penal Code § 32310, criminalizing the possession of large capacity magazines as of July 1, 2017, regardless of when the magazines were obtained. Then, on November 8, 2016, the California electorate approved Proposition 63, which largely mirrors SB 1446. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.