Richard Manuel Burgos v. P.L. Kernan Attorney General, State of California

104 F.3d 365 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Richard Manuel BURGOS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. P.L. KERNAN; Attorney General, State of California, Respondents-Appellees. No. 96-15579. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 16, 1996. * Decided Dec. 20, 1996. Before: SNEED, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 California state prisoner Richard Burgos appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition challenging a prison disciplinary proceeding in which he was found guilty of manufacturing a silencer and was assessed 75 days of good time credits. We have reviewed the record and affirm substantially for the reasons set forth in the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, filed on July 11, 1995, and adopted by the district court on January 16, 1996. 3 We reject Burgos's claim that the district court erred by not conducting an in camera review of the confidential information. Such a…