McGary v. Wood

Good Law
104 F.3d 365·1996 WL 740897·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 37766
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 20, 199696-35279California731 words

Opinion

Opinion

104 F.3d 365 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. DARNELL OTIS McGARY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tana WOOD, Superintendent; Ron Van Boening, Assist. Superintendent; Ron Knight, Correctional Pro. Manager; Larry Sutton, Counselor CC-3; Dave La Ron Dale, PSW3; Noonen, Grievance Coordinator; Bill Whipple, Correctional Officer; Steve Hubbs, Correctional Officer; Bonds, Correctional Officer; Renick, Correctional Officer; Mitchel, Correctional Officer; Pivier, Correctional Officer, Defendants-Appellees. No. 96-35279. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 16, 1996. * Decided Dec. 20, 1996. Before: SNEED, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Darnell Otis McGary, a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendants in McGary's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. McGary contends that defendants violated his civil rights when they: (1) subjected him to excessive force; (2) denied him…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.