Camper v. Lewis

Good Law
104 F.3d 365·1996 WL 740855·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 37752
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 20, 199696-15157California793 words

Opinion

Opinion

104 F.3d 365 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jeff CAMPER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Samuel A. LEWIS, Director; J.C. Kenney; Samuel Sublett; William Gaspar; Sgt. Washington; CSO Duran; CSO Orr; Straub, Officer; Rodriques, CSO; and Jackie Canary, Defendants-Appellees. No. 96-15157. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 16, 1996. * Decided Dec. 20, 1996. Before: SNEED, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jeffrey K. Camper, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment for defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo the district court's grant of summary judgment, see McGuckin v. Smith, 974 F.2d 1050, 1059 (9th Cir.1991), and we affirm. 3 On appeal, Camper contends that the district court erred by granting summary judgment for defendants on his claims that defendants' misuse of money from the special…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.