Thomas Twiddy v. City of Healdsburg S. Brouchard, Officer Spotswood, Officer Steve Cox, Officer Rob Thiessen, Res Officer

104 F.3d 366 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Thomas TWIDDY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF HEALDSBURG; S. Brouchard, Officer; Spotswood, Officer; Steve Cox, Officer; Rob Thiessen, Res Officer, Defendants-Appellees. No. 96-15879. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 16, 1996. * Decided Dec. 20, 1996. Before: SNEED, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Thomas Twiddy appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of the City of Healdsburg ("City") and several Healdsburg police officers in Twiddy's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that he was harassed by the City Police Department on a number of occasions dating back to 1980. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 Twiddy contends that the district court erred by concluding that defendants were entitled to qualified immunity as to Twiddy's claim that he was unlawfully arrested for driving with a suspended license. We…