Ross

Pac. Choice Seafood Co. v. Ross

Good Law
309 F. Supp. 3d 787
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 21, 2018Case No. 15–cv–05572–HSGCalifornia7,819 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Gilliam, J.

Pending before the Court are Plaintiffs' and Defendants' cross motions for summary judgment. Dkt. Nos. 70, 78. In this action, Plaintiffs Pacific Choice Seafood Company, Sea Princess, LLC, and Pacific Fishing, LLC challenge certain provisions of a federal fisheries management program that establishes an individual fishing quota program (the "IFQ Program"). For the reasons detailed below, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs' motion and GRANTS Defendants' motion for summary judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

This case concerns the manner in which the Secretary of Commerce and the National Marine Fisheries Service ("NMFS") regulate the fishing of Pacific non-whiting fish species off the coasts of Washington, Oregon, and California.

A. Statutory Background

Congress enacted the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation Act ("Magnuson Act" or the "Act") to "conserve and manage the fishery resources found off the coasts of the United States" and "to promote domestic commercial and recreational fishing under sound conservation and management principles." 16 U.S.C. § 1801 (b)(1), (3). The Act established eight regional fishery management councils, tasked with developing fishery management plans ("FMP") and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.