United States v. Richard Damon Dominguez

104 F.3d 366 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Damon DOMINGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 96-30009. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 16, 1996. * Decided Dec. 20, 1996. Before: SNEED, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Richard Damon Dominguez appeals his conviction and 37-month sentence following a guilty plea for possession of an unregistered destructive device, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5861 (d). 1 Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Dominguez's counsel filed a brief stating that he finds no meritorious issues for review, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. 3 Counsel identified two possible issues for review: (1) did Dominguez receive ineffective assistance of counsel due to counsel's failure to pursue an interlocutory appeal of the district court's denial of his suppression motion, and (2) did Dominguez receive…