Wright v. Gomez

Good Law
104 F.3d 366·1996 WL 740931·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 37721
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 20, 199696-55118California560 words

Opinion

Opinion

104 F.3d 366 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jesse James WRIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James GOMEZ, Director of Corrections & Warden; Julian S. Marquez; R.H. Denninger, Deputy Director CVSP; S. Ryan, Correctional Lieutenant; Associates CVSP, Defendants-Appellees. No. 96-55118. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 16, 1996. * Decided Dec. 20, 1996. Before: SNEED, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jesse James Wright, a California state prisoner released on parole, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motion for reconsideration concerning the district court's prior grant of summary judgment for defendants in Wright's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review for abuse of discretion the district court's denial of a motion for reconsideration, see School Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah County v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255 , 1262 (9th Cir.1993), and we affirm. 3…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.